Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 00:25
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 167
2-Core 331
98% 189 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 962
96% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,369
85% 1,369 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.9% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 108
Parallax 87.1
82% 98.7 fps
MRender 83
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 89
73% 88.5 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
121GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1705 1479 1712 1638 1763 1811 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1,958
Write 1,978
Mixed 1,974
SusWrite 1,685
428% 1,899 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 67.5
216% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,125
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 1,003
754% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 294%
Great: 477%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1244 1156 1148 1240 1260 1279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,700
Write 1,298
Mixed 1,434
SusWrite 1,221
317% 1,413 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 53.7
176% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,103
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 991
744% 996 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 242%
Great: 435%
Team T253X6512G 512GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 31 34 39 39 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.9% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 280 27" 1920 1017 AUS278F VG279QM
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $816
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback