Infinix INBOOK X2 SLIM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInfinix INBOOK X2 SLIM  (all builds)
MotherboardInfinix EM_TG325_200B_V1.0
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 08:24
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 32.8
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 142
47% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 12.5
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 9.8
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee VP1000F512G 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 601 527 587 528 631 569 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 571
Write 496
Mixed 653
SusWrite 574
130% 574 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 26.2
88% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 196
131% 158 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 26.2
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 4 0 14" 1280 720 MDT003D
Typical INBOOK X2 SLIM Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Infinix INBOOK X2 SLIM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback