Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17E2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 8SG
MotherboardMSI MS-17E2  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 16:14
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 76
2-Core 152
57% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 377
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
MSI(1462 1272) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 128
Parallax 88.4
95% 111 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 102
Splatting 69.5
80% 102 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 126%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,069
Write 1,378
Mixed 1,060
331% 1,502 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 50.7
164% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 513
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 435
333% 454 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 262%
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 1TB
861GB free
Firmware: JXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1267 1432 1244 1425 1434 1425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,086
Write 1,471
Mixed 1387
SusWrite 1371
302% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 38.3
129% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 567
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 498
379% 512 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 190%
Great: 516%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 108 121 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 117
68% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6H1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 3R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 199 57 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO409D
Typical MS-17E2 Builds (Compare 1,604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback