Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 10:11
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$77
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 145
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 404
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72
557GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 431 434 429 386 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 429
Mixed 390
SusWrite 413
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 38.9
127% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 124
128% 209 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 125%
USB DISK 3.0 496GB
123GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 1.5 0.1 0 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 152
Write 10
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 4.1
36% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 04CB EL63I1C1624ZV 06C1 SLZ302G08-GGNHC 04CB EL63I1B0823ZV 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0A3E S27C350
Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback