Asus P9X79-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79-E WS  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 14:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 616
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 104
Parallax 65.3
56% 79.4 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 63.6
45% 53.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 40 32 33 29 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 384
Write 415
Mixed 337
SusWrite 57.7
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 13.5
61% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 216
181% 258 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
389GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 165
Write 159
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 105
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-084.A01LF 6x2GB
6 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 27.9
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 15% 13 182 20 280 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25A9 VG259QM
Typical P9X79-E WS Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus P9X79-E WS - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $969
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback