Lenovo 20ARS00Y00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20ARS00Y00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ARS00Y00
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200327
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 19:01
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 106
51% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 157
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2370
Write 1420
Mixed 1,129
361% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 87.6
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 37.8
202% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 314
240% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
54GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.2
Write 23.6
Mixed 27.7
45% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
57% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ8416E6MB-GN-F Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 25 60 17" 1280 720 SAM018F SyncMaster
Typical 20ARS00Y00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ARS00Y00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback