Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 05:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 311
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 896
94% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 17.7
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 15.9
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 500GB 2G0C
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 236030WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,518
Write 1,477
Mixed 1,289
319% 1,428 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 79.8
293% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 870
709% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4161CAB2F2HB1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D1A S22F350
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback