Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 16:16
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$112
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 266
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 758
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 1,011
62% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 260
Parallax 278
227% 273 fps
MRender 357
Gravity 238
Splatting 185
204% 260 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 196%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220915a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2325 2298 2611 1234 1079 1108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,219
Write 2,774
Mixed 1,822
SusWrite 1,776
484% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 55.4
202% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,372
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 1,120
824% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 307%
Great: 320%
SSK 2TB
226GB free
Firmware: 7601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 185 216 198 199 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.4% Above average
Read 243
Write 183
Mixed 156
SusWrite 199
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 18.9
68% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
152% 209 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 94%
SSK 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 7401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 137 137 132 136 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 85.2
Write 123
Mixed 115
SusWrite 137
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 23.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 ACR085B QG241Y P
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $693
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $286WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback