Today's hottest deals

Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '17 at 01:03
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 409
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 3.5
4% 4.27 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 34
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.43
141% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 83%
Marvell Raid VD 0 1.5TB
968GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R Max speed: n/a
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 290
Write 171
Mixed 175
158% 212 MB/s
4K Read 3.22
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.84
309% 2.82 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback