Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SFX16-61G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFX16-61G  (all builds)
MotherboardPHX Ariya_PEH
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 12:22
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 170
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 570
54% 450 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Acer(1025 167A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.24
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.1% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 53.9
24% 36 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 52.4
33% 38.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,643
Write 3,585
Mixed 2,516
723% 3,248 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 73.1
238% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 726
521% 676 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 53
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 34.6
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 45.1
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 16" 1280 720 SDC418D
Typical Swift SFX16-61G Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Acer Swift SFX16-61G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback