MSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 03:40
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 72
2-Core 141
54% 93 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 271
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 57.3
48% 59.5 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 57.9
50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 299 85 50 54 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 535
Write 486
Mixed 463
SusWrite 97.5
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 39
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 326
258% 355 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 209%
Samsung MZ7KM1T9HAJM-0E005 2TB
281GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 168 282 277 323 341 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 368
Write 363
Mixed 339
SusWrite 281
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 30.7
100% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 322
245% 332 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 123%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$243
733GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 127 147 144 141 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 149
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 136
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
309% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 110%
ST16000N M000J-2TW103 16TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 33 17 18 13 9.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.7% Excellent
Read 233
Write 213
Mixed 167
SusWrite 23.4
201% 159 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 1.2
613% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 5.7
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.1
351% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 93%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
167GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 264
Write 250
Mixed 258
330% 257 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 15.1
1,093% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 30.9
2,470% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 91% Great: 227%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 250G 250GB
37GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 314
Write 303
Mixed 309
397% 308 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 16.6
1,266% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 38.7
DQ Mixed 30.6
2,455% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 Kingston 99U5584-008.A00LF Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF Kingston 9905584-012.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 24 60 19.5" 1920 1080 PHLC103 PHL 200V4Q
Typical H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 1,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $868
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback