HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory28 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 00:49
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 147
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 416
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 105
Reflection 128
Parallax 216
86% 150 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 111
Splatting 171
131% 160 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB30 300GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0370
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 268 243 234 211 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 354
Write 333
Mixed 262
SusWrite 247
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 24.6
85% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 228
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HUS726060AL 6TB
169GB free
Firmware: T7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 168 177 175 172 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 160
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 172
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
128GB free
Firmware: 1H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 89 89 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 88
Write 90.4
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 87.8
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 69%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 900GB
348GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 49 49 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 175
Write 47.4
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 48.5
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
902GB free
Firmware: 4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 105
64% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 62%
Netapp X423_SLTNG900A10 900GB
838GB free
Firmware: NA02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 61 60 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.3% Very good
Read 198
Write 60.7
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 60.4
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.17 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:85 7F F721GU67F9333G ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:85 7F F721GU67F9333G ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 20.1" 1280 720 BNQ76F2
Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback