Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 251673U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 251673U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 251673U
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130214
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 01 '18 at 13:47
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 70.3
37% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 99.6
8-Core 127
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 0.69
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.62 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate USB 1TB
739GB free
Firmware: 0412
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 21.1
Mixed 22.6
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.12
28% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion 750GB
489GB free
Firmware: 0636
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 24
Mixed 28.1
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.32
82% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC3ZC70F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 92.3
Mixed 83.7
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.34
77% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.7
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback