QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory29.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 29.3GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory26 GB free of 29.2969 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 19:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: QEMU Virtual version 2.5+
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 45.2
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 19.3
25% 33 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 305
26% 222 Pts
64-Core 2208
137% 2208 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 84%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 3TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 110 106 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
Read 149
Write 128
Mixed 138
SusWrite 108
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 4.2
762% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 29GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 13616 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 68.6
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 46.8
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 123%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 15 64 0" 1024 705
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback