HP OMEN 30L Desktop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 145% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP OMEN 30L Desktop (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8876
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220329
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '23 at 08:12
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 75.5 1-Core 153 2-Core 241 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 892 82% 685 Pts	64-Core 1,524 94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	181% Outstanding	Lighting 257 Reflection 243 Parallax 267 209% 256 fps	MRender 310 Gravity 224 Splatting 169 184% 234 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TB 4,202 User benchmarks, average bench 236% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,032 Write 2,276 Mixed 1,821 457% 2,043 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 68.8 236% 86.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,089 DQ Write 711 DQ Mixed 939 690% 913 MB/s
Poor: 163% Great: 315%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 557GB free Firmware: MX4OAD60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 160 160 158 162 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 196 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 160 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 108%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 421GB free Firmware: 2BE10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 46.5 Write 51.3 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 61 37% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 53.3 Write 34.7 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 36.9 48% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 53%
ASMT 2115 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 121 124 126 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 135 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 124 165% 121 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 1.3 366% 4.53 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 4.8 DQ Mixed 1.5 218% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 74%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 164GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 127 114 127 116 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 146 Write 134 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 120 160% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 70%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 838GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 22 22 22 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 52.7 Write 35.1 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 23.7 44% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 69% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 70%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 50GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 36.5 Mixed 34 SusWrite 22.9 43% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 83% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP37D4U1D8HD-16X 2x16GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 35.7 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 28.8 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 37.5 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	100	48.8"	1280 720	SAM0F9C C49RG9x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 177%

UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	7x
Core i9-11900KIntel $250Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	7x
Core i7-11700KIntel $225Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	5x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	11x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,104Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	7x
RTX 3070Nvidia $495Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	4x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples	17x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 217%, 3,622 samples	4x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBWDCBench 191%, 10,094 samples	3x

RAM
HP37D4U1S8ME-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 90%, 6,088 samples	6x
HP37D4U1S8ME-16XR 2x16GBKingstonBench 98%, 2,425 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 90%, 4,054 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $774

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406