Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 11:19
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 308
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.0.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 23 4.2 30 38 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 239
Write 201
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 23.6
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 24.4
96% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 91.5
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 42
37% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43%
Great: 96%
ST325062 0A 250GB
233GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.28% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 7.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 7.7
10% 7.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-015.A00LF Samsung 6GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 30 60 32" 1280 720 VST6612 VST6612 Demo
Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback