Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120420
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 02 '18 at 14:38
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 479
51% 408 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 21.4
19% 21.1 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 18.2
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 265
Write 112
Mixed 147
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 8.92
64% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 8.12
15% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
897GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 144
Write 137
Mixed 137
105% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.41
102% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-10-9 D3-1866 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback