Kubevirt None

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory31.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemKubevirt None  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.7 GB free of 31.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1008 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 17:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Broadwell, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 115
44% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 435
38% 325 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suse VirtIo Block 107GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 49 47 49 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 52.7
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 48.6
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.3
599% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15872 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 50.8
146% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 123%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 14 32 0" 1280 720
Typical None Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Kubevirt None

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback