Acer Predator PH16-71

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Discovery_RTX
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 23:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 198
2-Core 392
116% 223 Pts
4-Core 758
8-Core 1,443
131% 1,100 Pts
64-Core 2,485
154% 2,485 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 166C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 190
Parallax 212
183% 209 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 178
Splatting 125
156% 202 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 159%
Great: 152%
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 166C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3425
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.97% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11.3
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 416
Write 3,751
Mixed 2,980
1,820% 2,382 MB/s
4K Read 90.5
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 131
22,713% 153 MB/s
DQ Read 1,892
DQ Write 1,433
DQ Mixed 1,622
14,993% 1,649 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 46.5
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 26
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 125%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 240 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5BDF LG FULL HD
Typical Predator PH16-71 Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PH16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback