Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V20.4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V20.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V20.4
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 18:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 172
2-Core 329
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 777
85% 673 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1243) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.2% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 15.8
36% 42.2 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 12.5
40% 54.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 1056 1713 1789 2042 2165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,057
Write 1,132
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 1,720
291% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 52.1
185% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 536
378% 492 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 225%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43CB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 36.8
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 24.2
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ABRA A5 V20.4 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Monster ABRA A5 V20.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback