HP ProBook 650 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 650 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82AA
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 06:29
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 58.6
2-Core 107
47% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 170
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.5
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SMSM151S3/512G 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 208 228 225 232 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 370
Write 252
Mixed 286
SusWrite 222
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 8.4
56% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 16.2
58% 125 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.6% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.6
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO35ED
Typical ProBook 650 G3 Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback