Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KD  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 12:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 145
2-Core 214
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 423
50% 386 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 6
4% 7.1 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 1
4% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA6-8D512 512GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ER23401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 68 69 80 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 2177
Write 60.6
Mixed 134
SusWrite 73.5
128% 611 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 41.3
157% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 126
205% 426 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 165%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 15
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical GA-G5 KD Builds (Compare 1,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback