Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550M BAZOOKA (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M BAZOOKA (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 18:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 39.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
68% 134 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 810
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14546
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 164 172 170 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 326
Write 364
Mixed 355
SusWrite 169
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 23.9
63% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 221
166% 216 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 24 64 0" 1280 720
Typical MAG B550M BAZOOKA (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M BAZOOKA (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback