HP EliteBook 2760p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 2760p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 162A
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280x800x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '16 at 18:10
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 142
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 212
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 162A) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.58
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.55 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 250
Write 160
Mixed 195
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 12.9
53% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 60.7
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 10.5
22% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%
ASMT 2105 8TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 21.5
Write 20.4
Mixed 5.47
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 5.35
4K Mixed 0.4
200% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2760p Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2760p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback