Asrock B760M-C R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B760M-C R2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760M-C R2.0
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 21:38
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$320
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 207
2-Core 419
125% 239 Pts
4-Core 799
8-Core 1,172
123% 986 Pts
64-Core 2126
132% 2126 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$388
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.09
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 196
Parallax 216
174% 208 fps
MRender 310
Gravity 169
Splatting 127
156% 202 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,924
Write 4,080
Mixed 2499
642% 2,834 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 298
4K Mixed 102
379% 153 MB/s
DQ Read 1,688
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,328
1,003% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 37.2
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 26.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 31.5" 1280 720 SAM72FE LS32CG51x
Typical B760M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

System: Asrock B760M-C R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback