Today's hottest deals

Compaq(intel Default

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemCompaq(intel Default  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime67.4 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 19:03
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 42.3
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 142
47% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CSE80A1A100-512G 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0327A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 321
Write 267
Mixed 291
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 10.5
42% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 46.5
79% 152 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Mic Electronics MGSI416G26.C19 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 15.6" 1280 720 BOE0747
Typical Default Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq(intel Default

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback