Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A515-48M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-48M  (all builds)
MotherboardBC Kelly_BCU
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 09:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 67.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 322
96% 185 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 834
91% 718 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1688) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 29.6
18% 23.7 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 22.4
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
867GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1648
Write 2548
Mixed 1,583
433% 1,926 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 63.2
221% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 890
648% 849 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 337%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 218 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO76A8
Typical Aspire A515-48M Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire A515-48M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback