Acer V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 19:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 98.2
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 52.3
47% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 108
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 068A) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 119 36 29 34 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 381
Write 219
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 76.2
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1
35% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 27.1
47% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GCM.9K30C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.2
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 30 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0340
Typical V3-771 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback