Gigabyte GA-Z270XP-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170XP-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270XP-SLI  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 21:54
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 39.3
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 40.8
23% 34.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 406
31% 278 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 151
Parallax 242
93% 169 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 229
Splatting 184
200% 255 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 124%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 72 77 78 76 67 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 234
Write 119
Mixed 164
SusWrite 74.9
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 14.8
54% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 92.7
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 105
80% 107 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 75%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
194GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 286 81 81 80 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 410
Write 270
Mixed 356
SusWrite 157
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 18.1
68% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 173
171% 272 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 128%
Verbatim Vi550 S3 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W0825A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 312 316 352 357 341 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 381
Write 356
Mixed 327
SusWrite 332
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 11.9
52% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 33.6
59% 113 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 100%
ST3320620AS 240GB
36GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 129 52 49 26 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 356
Write 290
Mixed 217
SusWrite 94.1
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 7.1
39% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 14
33% 69.4 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
103GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 54 52 53 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 70.9
Write 33
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 52.8
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 17 60 31.5" 2560 1387 PHLC181 PHL 328E9F
Typical GA-Z270XP-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270XP-SLI - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $742
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback