Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-58  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Camellia_TL
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 18:42
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 185
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 224
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 10.5
6% 8.03 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 6.8
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,167
Write 1,262
Mixed 1,191
270% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 63.7
221% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 665
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 560
429% 584 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 235%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB
13GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.4
Write 10.5
Mixed 7.5
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.7
108% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.2% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 5.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD06E4
Typical Aspire A315-58 Builds (Compare 1,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback