MSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D70
MotherboardMSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)  (all builds)
Memory43.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2103 x 1183 - 32 Bit colors, 2103 x 1183 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231123
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 19:39
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 212
2-Core 416
119% 234 Pts
4-Core 836
8-Core 1,647
147% 1,242 Pts
64-Core 3653
226% 3653 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 167
Parallax 160
150% 170 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 127
Splatting 112
110% 139 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1968 2155 2019 2014 2008 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,251
Write 1,784
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 2,017
405% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 60.6
181% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,409
DQ Write 1,367
DQ Mixed 943
831% 1,240 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 332%
Great: 370%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
379GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3340 3468 3424 3329 3071 664 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
499% Outstanding
Read 3,775
Write 3,595
Mixed 2,693
SusWrite 2,883
727% 3,236 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 71.1
249% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 2,407
DQ Write 1906
DQ Mixed 2,019
1,548% 2,110 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 499%
Great: 623%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3095 3324 3279 3357 3118 3289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 3,183
Mixed 2,134
SusWrite 3,243
589% 2,588 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 63
208% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,725
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,136% 1,507 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 400%
Great: 441%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2072 2108 2069 2065 2070 2152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 1,689
Write 2,076
Mixed 1,929
SusWrite 2,089
441% 1946 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 60.8
203% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 2187
DQ Write 1,670
DQ Mixed 1,847
1,404% 1,902 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 343%
Great: 394%
WD WD121PURZ-85GUCY0 12TB
8TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 154 193 180 176 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 152
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 176
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 138%
Hitachi HUS726040ALE610 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: APGNTD05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 171 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 183
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 169
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
228% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMH32GX5M2B5600C40 CMH32GX5M2B5600C40 CMH32GX5M2E6000C36 CMH32GX5M2E6000C36 64GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 41.3
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 41.1
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 38.9
118% 41.2 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 48 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACR012B Acer G245HQ
Typical MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70) Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $2,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback