AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 01:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11390H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 226
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 512
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3430
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 23.1
16% 21 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 14.8
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1483 1550 1155 106 109 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,003
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,285
SusWrite 751
316% 1,417 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67
233% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 832
613% 806 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 233%
Great: 233%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.5% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 23.9
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 17.4
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM5ACB LG HD
Typical Intel Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback