Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82GU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82GU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200628
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 22:09
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 861
84% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,173
73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A47) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 83.8
77% 89.9 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 72.8
65% 81.2 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,138
Write 2,083
Mixed 1,483
423% 1,901 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 60.3
195% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 694
DQ Mixed 405
423% 702 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 264%
Sabrent ASM225 2TB
662GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 319 319 320 321 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62% Good
Read 348
Write 320
Mixed 296
SusWrite 320
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 18.8
71% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 28.6
56% 111 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 82%
Sabrent ASM225 1TB
63GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 261 244 246 250 248 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 76%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 1TB
34GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 64 78 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 80.4
Write 86.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 75
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 0P 5R 6G 20B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 17% 64 211 57 144 27" 1920 1017 MSI4CB5 MSI G272
History: Score 23: 0P 1R 4G 6B | Score 63: 0P 5R 6G 20B
Typical 82GU Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 82GU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback