Acer Aspire M1201

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M1201  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer RS740DVF
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '18 at 07:40
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 33.2
2-Core 66.8
36% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 66.7
8-Core 66.9
9% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 67.7
4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 2100
Acer(1025 0155) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.5
0% 0.37 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 3H 120GB
106GB free
Firmware: SB3IC7UP Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 39.3
Mixed 20.2
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.22
66% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24%
Great: 24%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 46.6
Mixed 36.7
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Generic External 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 24.4
Mixed 11.8
25% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.34
68% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1201 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M1201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback