MSI B450M-A PRO MAX II (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX II (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 08:56
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 64.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 322
95% 183 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 1,009
100% 819 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 91%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.02.02
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 19.6
9% 13.6 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 17.7
13% 14.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200711
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 395
Mixed 334
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 11.9
88% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 15.9
67% 145 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 81%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
55GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.8
Write 89.2
Mixed 10.9
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 PC 8G 3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1920 1009 XMIA011 Redmi 215 NF
Typical B450M-A PRO MAX II (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX II (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback