Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 01:05
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$163
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 159
2-Core 317
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,259
111% 944 Pts
64-Core 1,504
93% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.42
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 35.9
22% 28.6 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 24.8
20% 23.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,080
Write 2,018
Mixed 1,782
438% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 73.6
256% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 1031
782% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
HP S750 1TB
660GB free
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 463 464 463 463 462 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 463
Mixed 424
SusWrite 464
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 26
148% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 35.5
86% 171 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
638GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2435 2436 2434 2432 2427 2421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
396% Outstanding
Read 2,441
Write 2,488
Mixed 2,178
SusWrite 2,431
538% 2,384 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 80.7
277% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,512
DQ Write 1394
DQ Mixed 1,395
1,062% 1,434 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 396%
Great: 623%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
195GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 495 495 495 495 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 495
Mixed 462
SusWrite 495
111% 493 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 66.3
217% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
255GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 102 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 75.8
Write 86.7
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 99.5
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$54
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 27
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 VSCE735 VX3276-FHD
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 2,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback