Microtec MIR5.6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicrotec MIR5.6  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 23:53
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 211
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 614
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 121
Parallax 126
109% 127 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 109
Splatting 94
92% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.S.F.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2225 2283 2280 2357 2339 2293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 2,435
Mixed 1,949
SusWrite 2,296
469% 2,063 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 64
219% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 863
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 770
554% 722 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 302%
Great: 606%
Synology HAT5300-8T 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 1401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 231 232 230 232 235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 230
Write 211
Mixed 116
SusWrite 232
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.5
7% 3.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2.1
DQ Write 6.4
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 25%
Synology HAT5300-8T 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 1401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 239 236 237 239 240 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 243
Write 236
Mixed 116
SusWrite 237
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.9
DQ Write 6.9
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 25%
SQF-S25M8-256G-SAC 256GB
47GB free
Firmware: SAFM02A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 301 318 298 304 250 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 302
Write 374
Mixed 306
SusWrite 302
73% 321 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 36.1
130% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 140
162% 278 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
644GB free
Firmware: RAGNWA09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 177 183 178 179 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 227
Mixed 109
SusWrite 180
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
419% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 3R 4G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 21% 68 215 59 120 34" 1280 720 DELD12D DELL S3422DWG
History: Score 26: 0P 2R 2G 10B | Score 40: 0P 3R 4G 13B
Typical MIR5.6 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Microtec MIR5.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback