Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '18 at 11:10
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 148
55% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 289
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 40
32% 40 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 46.4
34% 40.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 490
Write 399
Mixed 200
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 21.3
79% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 98.6
114% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 124%
Ccdisk iSCSI Cake 500GB
392GB free
Firmware:
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
Read 78.6
Write 111
Mixed 87.9
70% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.48
4K Write 2.95
4K Mixed 3.25
519% 2.89 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 64%
Ccdisk iSCSI Cake 1TB
33GB free
Firmware:
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 80.4
Write 111
Mixed 89.3
70% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.03
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 2.04
359% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
Ccdisk iSCSI Cake 1TB
30GB free
Firmware:
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
Read 75.7
Write 111
Mixed 78.1
66% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 2.28
387% 2.25 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback