Today's hottest deals

HP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B4D
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 12:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 166
2-Core 308
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 617
66% 527 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8B4D) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 20.1
13% 19.5 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 17.6
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 875 642 357 390 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,763
Write 1,292
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 591
264% 1,183 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 71.3
233% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 428
304% 394 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 196%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 30.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 23.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 60 27" 1280 720 HPN4068 HP ALL-in-One
Typical All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One Desktop 27-cr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback