Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E PG Lightning

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock X670E PG Lightning  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E PG Lightning
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 14:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$560
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 211
2-Core 416
120% 234 Pts
4-Core 798
8-Core 1578
140% 1,188 Pts
64-Core 3,600
223% 3,600 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
ASRock(1849 6001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5382
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 130
Parallax 234
79% 153 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
58% 84.9 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 122%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 494 413 303 304 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 492
Mixed 466
SusWrite 384
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 53.3
194% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6400J3239G16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
214% Outstanding
MC Read 137
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 63
237% 83 GB/s
SC Read 45.2
SC Write 54.2
SC Mixed 48.4
141% 49.3 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 214%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 31.5" 1280 720 ACR06DD ED322QR
Typical X670E PG Lightning Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E PG Lightning

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback