Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170-Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 29 '24 at 22:45
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 469
63% 470 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 20
Parallax 20
16% 20 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 20
51% 68.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 74 73 81 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 65.3
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 77.2
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB
256GB free
Firmware: AX0C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 109 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 59.5
Write 60.4
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 110
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100V 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: JU0C0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 124
Write 110
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 81.3
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
178% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 22.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 17 60 27" 1280 720 GSM5BB3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback