Lenovo 83FD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83FD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '24 at 15:23
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 226
2-Core 444
128% 250 Pts
4-Core 754
8-Core 1,219
121% 986 Pts
64-Core 2214
137% 2214 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3E43) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 11.8
9% 13 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EL1QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,676
Write 2,996
Mixed 2,776
631% 2,816 MB/s
4K Read 74.7
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 121
386% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,713
DQ Write 1,258
DQ Mixed 1440
1,088% 1,470 MB/s
Poor: 201% Great: 458%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 210
Write 28.8
Mixed 88.1
109% 109 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 11.2
804% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 9.7
1,022% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 68.9
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 54.3
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 23.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 145%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0C1D
Typical 83FD Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO

System: Lenovo 83FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback