Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | INTEL |
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
| Memory | 23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20231123 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 06 '24 at 20:58 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
70%
Very good
|
57% 93.7 Pts
|
58% 485 Pts
|
53% 856 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 5700-$275
XFX(1682 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
84.7%
Excellent
|
85% 152 fps
|
85% 106 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
P4-240 240GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H181124
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 24 25 24 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
24% 113 MB/s
|
54% 13.7 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 139 140 140 141 MB/s
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
77% 104 MB/s
|
216% 1.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28.5%
Poor
|
26% 9.13 GB/s
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
48% 82.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 67 | 55 | 60 | 23" | 1280 720 | AOC2351 2351 |
Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 550 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples | 231x |
| Xeon E5-2420 v2IntelBench 62%, 669 samples | 129x |
| Xeon E5-2470 v2IntelBench 63%, 279 samples | 63x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $144Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 31x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $104 |