Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '18 at 14:57
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 203 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 543 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% PowerColor(148C 2358) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 78.1 54% 68.5 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 53.4 Splatting 75.3 53% 62.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 6531244 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -8186207660168 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2623 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 155 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 56 25773473823 (C2) HDA temperature 31 56 25773473823 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6531244 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6531244 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6531244 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 17359 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14441 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14441 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13050 (F4) Unknown 96 96 8454273	51.6% Above average	Read 426 Write 109 Mixed 130 48% 222 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 6.9 84% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 79.1 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 25 40% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 73%
Samsung SP2504C 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 558GB free Firmware: 03.00C06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 1141 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 139 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 44 44 41521 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 137 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 97 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 139 (C2) HDA temperature 120 90 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.6% Above average	Read 110 Write 90.9 Mixed 95.3 74% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.51 133% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 57GB free Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 8 (03) Spinup time 199 198 3041 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 694 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 37 37 46621 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 694 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 132 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 809 (C2) HDA temperature 120 109 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.8% Average	Read 76.5 Write 82.6 Mixed 82.6 61% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.53 132% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G 8GB 1,226 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.6 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	193x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	141x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	121x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	128x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	76x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	25x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363