Today's hottest deals

Alienware m17 R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware m17 R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware m17 R4
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 21 '24 at 22:11
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 125
2-Core 242
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 863
78% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,261
78% 1,261 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 2048GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 401 524 273 251 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,288
Write 1,995
Mixed 1,484
SusWrite 314
287% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 47
178% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 474
374% 532 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 150%
Great: 471%
CT4000P3SSD8 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 86 88 266 87 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 1,113
Write 1,847
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 290
187% 837 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 6.1
104% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 559
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 154
157% 268 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 427%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 23.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 0" 1280 720
Typical m17 R4 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware m17 R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback