Today's hottest deals

MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E26
MotherboardMSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '24 at 20:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$199
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 201
2-Core 375
114% 218 Pts
4-Core 692
8-Core 1,156
113% 924 Pts
64-Core 1,421
88% 1,421 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 7E26) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.40.28
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 13
5% 10.9 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 20.8
12% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$140
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,937
Write 3,865
Mixed 2,765
646% 2,856 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 82.1
259% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,813
DQ Write 1,271
DQ Mixed 1580
1,170% 1,555 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 49.6
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 43.4
SC Write 54.9
SC Mixed 46.9
138% 48.4 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 137%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 160 34.1" 3440 1369 GSM7768 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 245%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $1,285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback