Today's hottest deals

MSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 384%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 470%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics385% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive463% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E28
MotherboardMSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '24 at 20:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$480
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 87.7
1-Core 220
2-Core 426
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1,128
107% 888 Pts
64-Core 3,061
190% 3,061 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
MSI(1462 5100) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
385% Outstanding
Lighting 621
Reflection 585
Parallax 767
506% 658 fps
MRender 519
Gravity 561
Splatting 292
358% 457 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 385%
Great: 402%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3726 3694 3642 2150 1356 1382 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
463% Outstanding
Read 3,984
Write 4,272
Mixed 3,056
SusWrite 2,658
786% 3,493 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 78.7
252% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,741
DQ Write 1,069
DQ Mixed 1,588
1,134% 1,466 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 463%
Great: 534%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD5BU016G-6000LA 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
190% Outstanding
MC Read 78.5
MC Write 64.6
MC Mixed 66.8
200% 70 GB/s
SC Read 52.1
SC Write 64.4
SC Mixed 60.2
168% 58.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 190%
Great: 206%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM7435 LS24C33xG
Typical PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28) Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $296
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback