Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '24 at 19:38
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 29.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
57% 113 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 535
58% 460 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 28.5
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 12.5
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 57 66 33 43 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.9% Average
Read 44.5
Write 228
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 58.9
21% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 31
115% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 13.2
43% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G KF2666C16D4/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 15.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 3R 3G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 16% 116 63 30 75 24" 1920 1080 IPS2400 BKY240
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback