Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17L5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star Katana 17 B12UCR
MotherboardMSI MS-17L5  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '24 at 20:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 66.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 328
97% 186 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 906
96% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C7) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 13.3
10% 13.8 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 14.1
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,252
Write 1,324
Mixed 1,056
270% 1,211 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 28.7
170% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 616
428% 542 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOL 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.8% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 4R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 16% 63 213 57 144 17.3" 1920 1009 AUO53AB
Typical MS-17L5 Builds (Compare 1,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback