Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator POX-955

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 425%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 575%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics367% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator POX-955  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator POX-955
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '24 at 10:58
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$439
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 242
2-Core 473
134% 264 Pts
4-Core 891
8-Core 1,727
155% 1,309 Pts
64-Core 4,125
255% 4,125 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 122%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Acer(1025 A675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
367% Outstanding
Lighting 580
Reflection 561
Parallax 754
473% 632 fps
MRender 512
Gravity 552
Splatting 297
356% 454 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 367%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1855 1818 1829 1797 1730 1728 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,945
Mixed 454
SusWrite 1,793
323% 1,436 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 64.4
212% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,489
DQ Write 1,075
DQ Mixed 1,218
927% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 295%
Great: 581%
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
939GB free
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2907 2661 2590 2602 2625 1944 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
433% Outstanding
Read 3,186
Write 2,663
Mixed 2,093
SusWrite 2,555
589% 2,624 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 76.9
293% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,577
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,275
971% 1,322 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 433%
Great: 581%
Jmicron Generic 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 680 680 599 657 605 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc KN.0320T.001 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 69.2
MC Write 66.7
MC Mixed 60.5
187% 65.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 30
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 153%
This bench: 165%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical Predator POX-955 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 603%
UFO

System: Acer Predator POX-955

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback